![]() ![]() The court issued "statement of ethics principles and practices" that defended current practices and has otherwise remained silent. Debate over Thomas has devolved into a partisan fight, with Democrats demanding more information and most Republicans brushing the revelations aside.Ĭhief Justice John Roberts declined an invitation to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The letter underscored the challenge Democrats in Congress are likely to face as they look for a legislative response to the ethics scandal unfolding just across the street at the Supreme Court. Crow, rather than an investigation that furthers a valid legislative purpose." "Given the Letter’s timing and focus, this inquiry appears to be a component of a broader campaign against Justice Thomas and, now, Mr. "The timing of and context surrounding the Letter point to a different purpose," Crow's attorney wrote. The response suggested Crow would also fight a congressional subpoena, if one was issued, noting that Congress can only make such demands for a "legitimate legislative purpose."Įxplainer: Do past Supreme Court cases offer clues about how the justices view ethics, transparency?Ĭode fix: Would a code of ethics fix the Supreme Court? Some raise concerns about enforceability The letter was a response to a request last month by Wyden for more information about the gifts and whether they implicate the federal gift tax. "As you are aware, the committee's powers to investigate are not unlimited." "We have serious concerns about the scope of and authority for this inquiry," Crow's lawyer, Michael Bopp, wrote in a letter to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore. ![]() WASHINGTON − Harlan Crow, the Republican donor who feted Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas with luxury travel and other gifts, is rebuffing an effort by Senate Democrats to look into those exchanges. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |